Vacancy caducado!
Dears CA Licensed Attorney
This is a request for Case Review for an individual complaint and/or a Class Action Lawsuit related to the Real Estate Brokerage Industry in California.
We will present it below as if it’s a Class Action against every Brokerage and Broker operating in California since 1985. The exact same foundation will be required for an individual case. An individual case would be against Coldwell Banker and Keller Williams.
-
1) The Class Action (or individual claim) is for “Breach of Fiduciary Duty”. The Brokers have been dealing in obscenely confusing Purchase Agreements and Documents that contained suggestions, statements of fact, and omissions that falsely framed California Laws and Codes intended to Protect Buyers. Given the lack of subtlety in the confusion, all Brokers and Agents did or should have known the documents created a grossly unjust bias for the benefit of Seller’s, Brokers and other stakeholders in the total scope of Real Estate Transactions and Disputes. //// Pseudolegal “Paper Terrorism” is a newly coined concept that has recently resulted in a suspension of an Attorney in Vancouver Canada. This would fall under that type of concept. The Attorneys that created this are likely no longer practicing, as it appears this may have been put in motion in 1985, if not prior. However many others would have seen and touched this, and that obviously raises other concerns.
2) The Class Action would be filed on behalf of all BUYERS that have entered into Purchase Agreements and/or Entered into Purchase Agreements and completed transactions in California since 1985. NOTE: I am fully aware Buyer’s pay no commissions, and for that reason, other Class Actions from the Buyers side have been dismissed. Those case precedents should not apply in this case. Fiduciary Duties are Established in a Buyer Broker Agreement, with acknowledgement that no fees may be paid by the Buyer for the duties.
3) The lawsuit would be filed in California against every Real Estate Brokerage, Broker, and Agent for every transaction they've engaged in since 1985. The reason this applies to “every company and licensee” and “every transaction”, when it is being filed from the Buyer’s side, is because the Fiduciary Duties due to Buyers are due from BOTH the Buyers Brokerage/Agent as well as the Seller’s Brokerage / Agent, as shown in the image below.
-
This fraud is highly toxic, mentally. Legal confusion has been used as a weapon in plain sight for 30+ years and that speaks for itself.
The written documents are so “PREPOSTEROUS”, it can take hours, days or weeks to convince oneself that the fraud is even worse than it reads at face value. NOTE: “Preposterous” is a key element to Commercial Hoaxes, and that is in fact what this is.
Any Attorney who is interested in this must realize that it does implicate the current Legal Lobby in gross complacence, at a minimum. I have no desire or need to focus on that part of this case, as it speaks for itself, but we need a preliminary understand that that simply can not be hidden as part of this, because that involvement is what explains how this "pseudolegal gum shoe fraud" has lasted for 30+ years.
The CA Bar and the State Supreme Court have been made aware of this problem for over 2 years. with regular updates via social media. They knew a larger push would come if I could find no attorneys without advertising more.
There is no way to know at this time how the CA Bar will respond to Attorneys who take on this case and don’t automatically assume they will cause problems for those interested in rectifying this. It's important to remember the CA BAR is being sued for Racketeering. Some put in charge of have said that the task of cleaning up the malfeasance is too difficult to manage in the short term and it will take time to change problematic behavior.
Thus, the problems at the state level are in full exposure now. This would add to them, but this is not remotely the first ray of light hitting that group for correction and some may look at this as blessing in disguise.
If you are interested in this and are unsure how the CA Bar, the Chief Bar Counsel and CA Supreme Court Members might view your participation, set up an alias email address and ask them, or do it with your name visible. See how they respond. If you don’t like that response and want to whistle blow, please pass that to me so I can pass that to James Okeefe and Okeefe Media Group for publicity. Your name, and identity can be hidden in that if you’d like.
We feel a verdict in the individual case could have punitive damages in the millions and obviously we will generously share what can be gained.
We feel a verdict or settlement in the Class Action is 100M’s if not Billions. Ironically the Class Action may be an easier case to argue as it seems even less of our own story need be told on paper.
The ideal Attorney will be:
1) Licensed in California only and unconcerned about pressure that may be applied by the CA Bar on themselves and/or their license and/or
2) Licensed in California and others states, and not overly concerned about pressure on or loss of their CA License.
I have a four page case summary and a 5 page backstory for your review. I will provide a URL for taht document for those that inquire. After some period of days or weeks I will add that URL to this ad for those who feel a bit shy about reaching out and asking for it.
I am a prolific writer. I am legally fluent. I can do as much or as little writing as is required to make this happen.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Bryan Canary
NOTE: The NAR (National Association of Relators) and several major brokerages just lost an antitrust suit for 1.8 BILLION that tripled to 5.4 BILLION The firm that was involved in those immediately filed more upon that notice a few months ago. The real victims in transactions are buyers, but the class actions from buyers got kicked out before because they were related to money and payment of commissions. This is related to fiduciary duties and it puts the even greater frauds in far greater view. Also note, this problem with cloudy transaction documents seems to be found in many states. In a review of 20 states, South Carolina seems to be the only one with transparent documents.
Vacancy caducado!